3 Ohms lower impedance ? Speaking of impedance, Audio-Technica ATH-M50x vs ATH-M20x has 38 Ohm, while the other device has 47 Ohm. They have a neutral frequency response and a good amount of bass without overwhelming. The M40x also comes with a soft carrying pouch to protect from scratches and other cosmetic damage. It’s here that we start to see a greater difference between the two models. The cables are 3.5mm on both ends but the M40x uses a locking mechanism on the headphone end. Included when you purchase the M50x is are two straight cables and one coiled cable. the frequency response of these headphones is between 15 Hz to 24 kHz and it has a sensitivity of 98 dB. vs. Sony MDR 7506. vs. Sennheiser HD 280 Pro. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. Both experience a large dip at roughly 6 kHz, followed by a moderate peak at roughly 4.5 kHz. Response graphs, and EQ-ing accordingly Reply #1 – 2017-10-09 22:30:30. For the price, the M40x delivers an impressive sound suited to critical listening. The drivers measure 45 mm in diameter. Note that human hearing is limited to 20 kHz so this may not make a difference. Sound Folding and unfolding are done in one fluid motion with no stiffness. But with a little more analysis, it’s clear that there are a few small details between the M40x vs the M50x among many similarities. Sound. It’s also safe to say that it is the most neutral sounding option out of all four of them. They differ slightly in driver size, however. All aspects considered, there is nothing at this price that even comes close to the MX50s. The ear cups swivel 90 degrees for one-ear monitoring. Sensitivity – The M40x is 1 dB less sensitive than the M50x (98 dB vs 99 dB). We prefer to call it realistic! The M40x on the other hand, is very neutral, and more for studio monitoring rather than leisure listening. If there is any harshness in the mix, you’ll hear it, but the M40x won’t add any. Available in one color – matte black with a silver finish – the M40x headphones are sleek, professional-looking studio headphones.These are much larger than your typical consumer headphones on account of Audio-Technica having to fit those 40mm drivers in. Audio-Technica ATH-M20x vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. Driver size is an important distinction to make between the M40x vs the M50x. I would recommend you save for the M40x if possible, for one simple reason: That detachable cable! The total harmonic distortion of Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50x is 0.3% vs 0.2%, and the sensitivity difference is 3 dB (99 vs 96 dB). The M40x are obviously not quite as good as the M50x. The impedance is about 38 ohms and the frequency range is from 15,000 to 28,000 hertz. However, for best sound isolation, go for the M50x. Also, as you can see in the table above, a 40mm driver size on the M40x compared to 45mm, will result in some non-negligible difference in sound, that’s only fair to say. That isn’t to say that the M50x are too bassy. M40x is about $100 while the M50x is around $150. The 7506 has very prominent highs and sounds bright while the m40x has more bass. Audio-Technica is good at offering a comfy fit for extended periods of use. The models ATH-M40x and ATH-M50x work in a range of 15 Hz - 24 kHz and 15 Hz - 28 kHz respectively. When listening to classical through the M50x, you’ll really start to hear those bright, crisp highs come alive. The coiled cable has enough stretch to help prevent this from happening. From what I read, the M40X has a more "flat" response, vs the M50X having a little more bass (without being boomy). Not only are they substantially cheaper than the M50x, the gap between the two in terms of specs is much smaller than the price difference would suggest. Onyx WordPress Theme by EckoThemes. So expect a small amount of noise leakage. 3. has passive noise reduction. It does an even better job at balancing all different ranges of tonality and timbre than the M20x but it even goes a few steps farther. These small details give an impression of just how much work has gone into these headphones. They look a little bland, but the all-black utilitarian aesthetic could work for some. Audio-Technica ATH-M40x vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. And that’s the point really, the M40X are much more neutral and I seem to find the perfect mastering. Some users say the M40x is a better casual listening headphone than a monitoring headphone for its warmer response. Both are dynamic moving-coil type headphones with copper-clad aluminum voice coils and neodymium magnets. With consumer-focused headphones, the soundstage can be exaggerated. They’re both made of high-strength plastic, flexible metal, and premium materials that should be expected from anyone who’s used Audio-Technica products before. Head To Head Comparison: M40x vs M50x – What’s the Difference? For the extra money, you’d expect that from the M50x anyway and this isn’t really a deal maker or breaker. Some users have reported them to be a tight fit, to begin with – but after some breaking in, they become more comfortable. What we did notice was that when the M50x were used in more active environments, such as walking or at the gym, your ears can get seriously toasty. Im Gegensatz zum M50X besitzt der M40X deutlich ausgewogenere Mitten, was ihn meiner Meinung nach prädestinierter für die Bereiche Studio/Recording macht. If you want headphones for critical listening and monitoring then you will probably prefer the M40x. Like the M40x, the M50x are around-the-ear, closed-back headphones. Audio-Technica ATH-M50x vs ATH-M60x Headphones Review FIT. It differs VERY much from the ATH-M40fs in looks, comfort, size and above all sound. The M50x is also a closed-back headphone. I have taken to doing all my mixdowns and mastering on headphones lately and immediately started to notice better results. The bass is a bit more subdued, but many appreciate the fact that it’s tighter and more controlled this time around. After, you nailed the difference : more rotation for the earcups (180 vs 90°), one more cable (straight 1.2m), and little bit extra build quality. I have taken to doing all my mixdowns and mastering on headphones lately and immediately started to notice better results. While the M40x does have the smaller price tag vs the M50x, Audio-Technica didn’t skimp out on the materials and build quality. Audio Technica M40x vs M50x. This isn’t enough of a difference to put the M50x on a different level, though. The M50x also has surprisingly-good stereo imaging for a closed-back headphone, while the soundstage for both the M40x and M50x may leave something to be desired. It just has a little more kick compared to the M40x, thanks to the larger 45mm driver. Japanese companies known for the impeccable quality and value of their electronics produce everything from killer XLR cables, to microphones, to the subject of this comparison – monitoring headphones for music and audio production. Ath M40x vs M50x – Short Answer: Go for Ath-M40x if you’re searching for light headphones with extra-long cables. The ATH-M40x headphone has become a mainstay for many studios worldwide. The flatter the frequency response – the higher the score. Full Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Advertiser Disclosure. vs. Sennheiser HD 280 Pro. If you’re looking for a neutral sounding headphone in under $100, ATH-M40 is an excellent buy. It’s easy to see why these headphones are so highly rated. Here are some of the features you can expect: 1. Buy On Amazon. DESIGN Technical. The M40x on the other hand, is very neutral, and more for studio monitoring rather than leisure listening. The M50X' sound very similar to the M40x and costs significantly more. Specifications: - Driver Diameter: 40mm - Magnet: Neodymium - Voice Coil: CCAW (Copper-clad aluminum wire) - Frequency Response: 15 - 24000Hz - Sensitivity: 98dB Why is Audio-Technica ATH-M50x better than Audio-Technica ATH-M30x? Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. I own M40X and previously had a pair of M50 and I can say (as far as I can remember) the M50s had a much more engaging and fun sound I’d take this sound over my M40X any day if I didn’t produce music. Both headphones have a similar design and performance, but the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT are better mixed-usage headphones than the regular wired Audio-Technica ATH-M50x which are better for studio use. Listening to an artist who can nail those high notes like Prince or Michael Jackson will show how formidable these headphones are at reproducing those high-level frequencies. The driver is essentially a circular diaphragm that converts electrical signal into sound so you can listen. Not only are they more stylish than the M40x but also offer a richer, deeper sound courtesy of the 45mm driver. The M40x offers a more relaxed sound, paying as much attention to the highs and mids as it does to the lows. For the price, you’ll struggle to find anything better. Let’s take a look. 240g vs 285g; Scroll down for more details. M40x has a rather low impedance at just 35ohms and the frequency range is around 15,000 to 24,000 hertz. They have a frequency response of 15 - 28,000 Hz, Sensitivity 99dB, and Impedance 38 ohms. Frequency range – The M50x reaches an extra 4000 Hz further on the high-end, all the way to 28 kHz vs the M40x at 24 kHz. See the M50x Now. Audio Technica ATH-M50x: Best Sounding headphone under $200. The M40x uses high-strength plastics for the housings. 190g vs 285g; Scroll down for more details. X. The 40x still retains it’s V shape but is less aggressive than the 50x. Buying through any of the links below will earn me a small commission at no extra charge to you. The response has already been great. Let’s look at how these two compare against each other to help you decide which is the best one to get for your audio needs. Audio-Technica ATH-M30x vs Audio-Technica ATH-M40x. Audio-Technica ATH-M20x has sensitivity 96 dB, while ATH-M50x has 99 dB. This will drastically change the way these two headphones sound when reproducing audio in that range. ATH-M40x Specs Driver: 40mm Frequency Response: 15-24,000hz Impedance: 35ohm Cost: $99 Type: Over Ear Closed Headphone Monitor In box: headphones, Carry/Storage pouch, 1/8-1/4 adapter, removable 3m straight cable and 3m coiled cable Impression and sound: My first pair of 'Real Headphones' was the M40x by Audio Technica. According to the new Audio Technica ATH-M50x review, it seems to be more mobile-friendly than its predecessor.These look almost similar to ATH-M50, It has a detachable cord design with extra cushioned ear cups which makes it more comfortable. Audio-Technica ATH-M40x . The M50xBT are wireless, which makes them more convenient to use, and they have a decent control scheme on the ear cups, while the wired model doesn’t have any. The M40x and the M50x have detachable cables. The highs & bass are very aggressive compare to m40x. Just in case you wanted a new pair of gym headphones, we can confidently tell you that these aren’t the ones for you. Let's take a look at the frequency response. Speaking of impedance, Audio-Technica ATH-M50x vs ATH-M20x has 38 Ohm, while the other device has 47 Ohm. Made of durable lightweight plastic, this model offers over-the-ear padded muffs with a 90-degree swivel so you can adjust your fit as you need to. You can tell that every design element was well thought out and serves a purpose. They also have slightly better padding on the ear cups than the Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and Audio-Technica ATH-M50x.However, although the ear cups are large, the opening created by the padding feels a bit small and sometimes touches the tip of the ear. The M40x has a prominent peak at 14 kHz while the M50x has a large cut at roughly the same frequency. Surpisingly for such a popular headphone, the M50x is quite unforgiving - it sounds direct, in your face, with plenty of punch in the bass and an almost metallic sounding high frequency response. Similarly the M40X is a much better headphone than the M50X. The M50x is larger than the M40x and this also means bigger impedance and frequency response. The M50x has a peak bass response of 33 Hz, going down as low as 15 Hz. Audio-Technica chose neodymium magnets for the M40x. 28000Hz vs 22000Hz The Audio-Technica ATH-M30x are decently portable headphones. What does that extra 5mm get you? 20g lighter? ATH-M40x has a smaller frequency response range (15Hz to 24 KHz) as opposed to M50x extending up to 28 KHz. The M40x and M50x look almost identical, and that’s because they utilize much of the same design priciples. At first sight it’s very easy to mix these two up. This is a quality choice because of the properties of neodymium. The headband on the M40x appears to be slightly thinner than the M50x. *Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc, or its affiliates. Less weight means finer precision movement, and translates into better audio. With a peak response of around 9,000 Hz, it’s capable of handling all genres of music. Why is Audio-Technica ATH-M50x better than Audio-Technica ATH-M40x? On the other hand, if you need headphones so you can listen to music, I suggest you buy M50x because the added bass brings music to life. Audio Technica M40x. Sound We wrote this guide to serve as a convenient comparison between the two. Weighing a mere 10 oz, they’re unlikely to start feeling heavy even after hours of continuous wear. Let’s look at how these two compare against each other to help you decide which is the best one to get for your audio needs. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Why is Audio-Technica ATH-M30x better than Audio-Technica ATH-M50x? The M40x has a driver diameter of 40 mm, falling 5 mm short of the M50x. The M30x’s have a fixed 3-meter (almost 10-foot) straight cable. A surprisingly different sound, actually. Both the M40x and M50x are closed-back, meaning they’d work well for an artist or vocalist during recording. That being said, the tested frequency responses for both of these headphones are quite similar as we can see below from testing done by RTINGS.com, a great site for headphone reviews and other helpful test data. One drawback we noticed was that the treble leaks out of the headphones into the surroundings, giving people within a few feet of you a taste of what you’re listening to. This means a bit of better sound quality on the M50x side. Specifications: - Driver Diameter: 40mm - Magnet: Neodymium - Voice Coil: CCAW (Copper-clad aluminum wire) - Frequency Response: 15 - 24000Hz - Sensitivity: 98dB 4000Hz higher high-frequency? If you put them side by side, you’d struggle to tell the difference between them. It’d be difficult to find a person with a head that’s too big for these headphones. Even though we would have liked to have had a little extra padding on the headband, it doesn’t noticeably affect the comfort, and for the price, we really couldn’t complain. This moderate peak is definitely higher in the M50x vs the M40x. The bass is tight and rolls of toward the sub-frequency range. Product Comparison: Audio-Technica ATH-M40X vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. The Land of the Rising Sun is responsible for bringing us some of the best audio gear around. If you’re used to listening to music with those kinds of headphones you might find the sound of the M40x to be a little narrow. All You Need to Know, Ultimate Guide to the Best Thunderbolt Audio Interface. Audio-Technica ATH-M50 X Studio Kopfhörer - dynamisch, geschlossen, ohrumschließend, 45 mm Treiber mit Neodym-Magnetsystem und CCAW-Schwingspulen, 90 Grad schwenkbare Ohrmuscheln, Frequenzbereich 15 - 28000 Hz, Max. Like their older brother, the ATH-M50x, the Audio-Technica ATH-M40x are not a small pair of headphones, and your first clue will be the sheer size of the box here. 220g vs 240g; Scroll down for more details. This model also comes with 2 detachable cords — one coiled, one straight, both 3m long. SonoBoom.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. The M50x ear cups are able to swivel a full 180 degrees vs the M40x which can only swivel 90 degrees. 65g lighter? From here we see a gradual bass roll-off from 30 Hz and onward. The M50x inevitably has a less hyped bass response perhaps due to the larger drivers which are more capable of handling lower frequencies with a higher degree of accuracy. Audio-Technica ATH-M20x has sensitivity 96 dB, while ATH-M50x has 99 dB. Audio-Technica ATH-M30x. Comparing these two headphones can be quite tricky. So certain person like the M40X more than the M50X. Related: Audio Technica ATH M40x vs. M50x Audio-Technica has sacrificed a tight seal on the ear cups for extra padding and comfort. Frequency Response : Weight : Ath-M40x: Over-ear : 15Hz – 28KHz: 240 grams : Ath-M50x: Over-ear : 15Hz – 24KHz: 285 grams : Ath M40x vs M50x – Full Comparison: Build Quality. Audio Technica M40x vs M50x. The M50x definitely boasts a more boosted bass, and is more for casual listening. These are more than enough to provide light-weight, long lasting performance out of both headphones. The headband is nicely padded and keeps long listening experiences enjoyable. 2. We’ve seen some pretty big Bluetooth speakers come in smaller boxes. Audio-Technica is a favorite among audiophiles across the globe. The M50x has 45 mm diameter drivers which are 5 mm larger than the M40x. Starting with the older option between Audio Technica Ath-M40x vs M50x, the M40x features a similar build to the M50x (as we mentioned above). The M40x definitely shows a beefier response in that area. Just like the M40x, the M50x utilizes permanent rare-earth neodymium magnets. There are no squeaks or worrying sounds when opening or closing the headphones and you get a consistent experience with every use. The ATH-M40x costs about twice as much as the ATH-M20x. The frequency response of the first is 5Hz-35KHz, and 15HZ-28KHz in the latter model, though it won’t affect sound perception in the majority of cases. The other appliance works in a range from 15 Hz to 28 kHz. Any price and availability information displayed on https://www.amazon.com/ at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product. It's objectively better than a Frequency Response that is not as flat as possible. Audio-Technica ATH-M40x. The headphones also come with three cables, one 1.2 m – 3.0m coiled cable, … The M40x headphones feel robust and durable enough to handle the knocks and bumps that come with use. But the beefier M50x is packing a 45mm driver, whereas the M40x only has a 40mm. Jazz Bass vs. 2000Hz higher high-frequency? The M50x and the M40x are both around the ear headphones and can feel a little tight out of the box, but users say they break in quite quickly and you’ll find them becoming more comfortable. If your mixes make use of stereo space then they’ll sound amazing on these headphones. Of course, we’d expect the M40x to be less impressive when looking at specs, but the difference between the M40x and M50x is probably less than you think. Headphones with large drivers can often cause comfort issues, although with the M40x this isn’t the case. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. If you are looking for high quality headsets that far exceed their value, these two are your best bet. Audio-Technica ATH M40x vs M50x: Overview, Audio-Technica ATH M40x vs vs M50x Conclusion: Similarities & Differences, Frequency Response Similarities & Differences, monitoring headphones for music and audio production, What is a Monitor Speaker? M40X vs M50x. Either pair will impress you when it comes to build quality. As a general rule of thumb, a larger driver diameter usually means better bass reproduction. The Audio Technica ATH M40x’s often get overlooked because of their 50x brother. If you’re comparing the M50x to consumer headphones known for their bass, then you may be a little disappointed. The flat oval ear cups add a bit more flare to the overall look of the headphone with silver accents around the logo. 95g lighter ? My issue with the M40x is that the bass seems a bit non-existent with how the graph is shaped (at least compared with the M30x). Other headphones that offer this same feature can have weak points where the cups rotate. But if you’re a mixer or sound engineer who has to wear cans all frequen’ day, I think the M60x will leave you feeling less fatigued in terms of pressure on the ears. It’s super useful to prevent the cable from being ripped out if somebody trips over the wire, but can be a nightmare to replace a snagged cable. The impedance is about 38 ohms and the frequency range is from 15,000 to 28,000 hertz. There’s been incredible attention to detail in regards to the design of the M50x, even the marking to show where the cord goes is accented. Both headphones then see a dip between 300 Hz and 400 Hz and then a large, widened peak between 100 Hz and 200 Hz. The main differences between MDR 7506 vs m40x is their audio profile. For this difference, the audio quality is not significantly better. Both the M40x and M50x are folding and swiveling headphones. Why is Audio-Technica ATH-M50x better than Audio-Technica ATH-M20x? Why is Audio-Technica ATH-M20x better than Audio-Technica ATH-M50x? These are much larger than your typical consumer headphones on account of Audio-Technica having to fit those 40mm drivers in. However, for best sound isolation, go for the M50x. The ATH-M40 delivers clear, accurate mids with great low-mid depth. They excel in the highs, too, delivering bright, crisp highs with astounding tonal detail. While m40x sounded more relaxing while still have m50x detailness. Both are crafted from heavy-duty plastic and feature aluminum headband and extenders, they feel like the kind of headphones that’ll last you a long time. That being said, the M50x does capture the low frequencies better than most other headphones in this price range. In comparison, the beefier M50x has an impedance of 38 ohms and a frequency response range of 15 Hz to 28 Mhz. If you are buying M40X, the next question you might have is what is the difference the M40x and the M50x. They also do not have a detachable cable like the Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and Audio-Technica ATH-M50x and could get yanked off your head if something hooks the cable. I have always said and will keep saying both these models are among the best headphones under $150. This makes them handy for those of us who are both producers and DJs, and helps save space when traveling on the road for gigs. The stock ear pads are a cheaper memory foam, and some users say they aren’t very deep or comfortable and even effect the sound of the headphone. The M40x is foldable and the ear cups also swivel 90 degrees. We’ve seen some pretty big Bluetooth speakers come in smaller boxes.Open it up and the first thing you’ll see is a In this ATH M40x vs M50x comparison, we’ll cover all of the data and information you’ll need to know about for these two headphones. Is the bass on the AT M40x as anaemic as it looks on frequency response graphs? The channel matching on the ATH-M40x outdoes the ATH-M50x, as it doesn’t have imbalance in lower mids and bass. The higher the high-frequency response, the clearer and crispier the treble. With a low impedance of just 35 ohms and a frequency range of 15-24000 hertz, it would seem to play second-fiddle the beefier, meatier M50x, which sports a similar impedance of 38 oms, but with a larger frequency range of 15-28000 hertz. The ATH-40X is the cheaper (€ 100.-) brother of the M50(X). Made of durable lightweight plastic, this model offers over-the-ear padded muffs with a 90-degree swivel so you can adjust your fit as you need to. It’s time to talk about the biggest and possibly most important difference between the M40x vs the M50x. The bottom line is this –  a lighter voice coil leads to more precise movement of the diaphragm, and therefore a more accurate reproduction of audio. Everything from the packaging to the style and design, the attention to detail and incredibly realistic sound reproduction makes these headphones a solid choice. If the high-quality audio is going in, high-quality audio will come out. 28000Hz vs 22000Hz; 3dB/mW higher sound pressure level? Audio-Technica hasn’t held back in terms of choosing quality construction materials. Published with WordPress. You can measure the response on fake heads to see the response and the m50x is certainly a harsher sound than the m40x. The headband seems slightly thicker on the M50x vs the M40x, and it’s extremely flexible. The Audio-Technica ATH-M70x are above-average comfortable headphones. Below the frequency plot of the ATH-M40X. They have a similar sound signature to that of the 50x, but are more neutral overall. Aftermarket Brainwavz ear cups are a decent alternative if you want to upgrade the stock ear cups on the M40x. This was the same with the M40x. They are also slightly … If you’re producing audio in a less-than-ideal acoustic space (a bedroom, for instance) then closed-back headphones will help due to their superior sound isolation. After wearing them for several hours we didn’t experience any fatigue or too much heat from the ear cups. Designers use CCAW to reduce the weight of the voice coil while still maintaining a high degree of conductivity. Frequency Response should be as flat as possible. Consumer headphones such as the Beats range have a tendency to beef up particular frequencies, usually, the bass, whereas monitor headphones provide accurate vocals and tones. Let us check out the details of each of these headphones now. Synaptic Sound was founded in April 2018 as an educational and informational resource for electronic music producers, DJs, and enthusiasts. Closed back design. The M40x has a low impedance of 35 ohms and a frequency response range of 15 Hz to 24 MHz. We will first talk about the specifications of Audio Technica M40x. Further down between roughly 400 Hz and 1 kHz, the M50x hugs the 90 dB SPL neutral axis with another very flat region, while the M40x sees a slight cut in this range and remains below 90 dB SPL. 6000Hz higher high-frequency? The new Audio-Technica ATH-M50x (available at Amazon for $149.00) have been on shelves for a little while, and both regular consumers and the audiophile community have fallen in love all over again.. By offering a sound profile that lends itself well to mixing and listening, these cans have a broad appeal to both DJ and commuter alike. I would recommend you save for the M40x if possible, for one simple reason: That detachable cable! 24000Hz vs 22000Hz; 2dB/mW higher sound pressure level? The M50x are monitoring headphones and designed to be worn for long periods of time and the comfort factor reflects this. Audio-Technica ATH-M30x vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. The M50x definitely boasts a more boosted bass, and is more for casual listening. The M50x takes the lead in this category as the ear cups swivel a full 180 degrees for superior one-ear monitoring, whereas the M40x cups only swivel 90 degrees. Is this really the case? The boosted treble imparts the music with fake detail and emphasizes overtones on just about every instrument. The voice coils for both headphones are made of the same material – copper-clad aluminum wire. Sony WH1000XM3 has impedance 16 Ohm, while the rate of Audio-Technica ATH-M50x is 38 Ohm. They have a similar sound signature to that of the 50x, but are more neutral overall. Frequency response isn't the only thing that's important though and i personally prefer the m50x. The headband is made of springy metal (looks like stainless steel), striking a balance between strength, flexibility, and weight reduction. Audio-Technica ATH-M50x . Included with the headphones is a standard, detachable straight cable and a coiled cable which comes in handy. From here, we see some more deviation in the 1.5 kHz to 3 kHz range, with the M40x remaining relatively flat while the M50x shows a peak at 2 kHz. M40x has a rather low impedance at just 35ohms and the frequency range is around 15,000 to 24,000 hertz. AudioTechnica must be commended here as the ATH-M60x shows a palpable increase in build quality over the M50x and its direct competitor, the Sennheiser HD25-II. Precision Bass: Head to Head Comparison (2020), The Best Audio Interface Under $200 for Your Recording Needs (Reviews - 2020), What Is the Best 8-Inch Subwoofer? According to data from RTINGS.com, the M40x has a more exaggerated bass response between about 100 Hz and 250 Hz, with a steeper bass roll-off past 30 Hz. Why is Audio-Technica ATH-M30x better than Audio-Technica ATH-M40x? The build quality and design between the M40x vs the M50x is nearly identical. Too much bass can negatively impact the listening experience, which is an issue in many consumer-focused headphones. Both the M40x and M50x will be well suited for monitoring applications during recording as they are good at blocking out ambient noise. Audio-Technica ATH-M40x. Audio Technica M50x. audio-technica ATH-M40X. They’re designed with long listening sessions in mind, so both offer exceptional comfort. If we think about the size differences between a subwoofer and a small tweeter, and the frequency ranges each is used for, it all begins to make sense. 220g vs 285g; Scroll down for more details. So it’s important for good studio headphones to get the midrange frequency response right. The quality of sound depends a lot on frequency response, which is 15 Hz - 20 kHz in the first case and 15 Hz - 28 kHz in the second one. Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. Audio-Technica is good at offering a comfy fit for extended periods of use. The M50x pays a little more attention to the bass than the M40x does and still reproduces the mids and highs with accuracy. This is the driver size. If you are looking for high quality headsets that far exceed their value, these two are your best bet. However i like to level the playing field by using sonarworks with headphones, this correctly eq's the headphones to give a flatter response.
2020 m40x vs m50x frequency response